Case Study: Who Decides?

I need support with this Management question so I can learn better. Case Study: Who Decides? In the Right of Self-determination, you’re Becoming an Ethical Helping Professional text, the authors discuss the essential responsibility of a professional to ensure that a client has exercised informed consent, allowing for agreement as well as refusal. Self-determination is a principle that underlies the practice of obtaining informed consent permissions from clients. In instances where mental health clients may or may not have an advanced directive and decide to leave a facility because they feel, “I am perfectly alright,” consider who should decide. The question is, can a client be said to have an absolute right to self-determination, or are there circumstances when that principle may not be applicable? What is the supervisor’s response to an employee’s rejection of a client’s invocation of the right of self-determination, when the exercise of that right can harm the client or harm others? Drawing on your readings, consider this dilemma and offer your decision with an explanation to the employee faced with this circumstance. Your initial post must: Be at least 250 words in length.
Contain a minimum of two references with citations in APA style.
Follow APA style guidelines.
Response GuidelinesRespond to the posts of at least two of your peers concerning their thoughts about the dilemma. Ask questions that will help you better understand each post and contribute to expanding the discussion. Make substantive suggestions that will provide food for thought.
Requirements: APA | Discussion | 1 page, Double spaced