First, it is vital to gather all relevant information and related facts to ensure all decisions are informed. In the current case, it is critical to assess the ethical principles in the absence of communication between Clinton and Professor Purloin.

I’m trying to learn for my Psychology class and I’m stuck. Can you help?Case Study: Clinton Clever’s term paper con-tained a literature background and a detailed design for an ingenious experiment. Professor Purloin fleshed it out a little more, collected data, and published it without any reference to Clever. Mr. Clever complained to his advisor, who in turn confronted Purloin. Purloin’s response was, “Clever expressed no intention of ever running the study. He is just an undergraduate student. If he had asked to be involved, I would have let him help with it. He could never have executed it on his own. Besides, I gave him a perfect score on this paper.”Ethical Strategy: The eight-step model is designed to guide psychologists in creating the decision-making process for interventions. First, it is vital to gather all relevant information and related facts to ensure all decisions are informed. In the current case, it is critical to assess the ethical principles in the absence of communication between Clinton and Professor Purloin. Decision-makers must acknowledge all applicable and relevant codes. Second, one needs to benchmark collected data against existing guidelines. Institutional contractual and plagiarism policies can help find a solution by assessing all applicable rules and regulations. Third, it is imperative to regard all options and perspectives, citing how they are tied to the current case. Decision-makers can integrate external factors that could influence the ultimate solution. The step helps avoid bias, ensuring equal consideration for Clinton and Professor Purloin (Koocher & Keith-Spiegel, 2016). Fourth, it is vital to partner with other individuals who arguably have a more profound understanding of ethical issues and dilemmas. The process also guarantees fair and impartial judgments and final decisions.Fifth, one must identify and assess all affected parties’ rights, responsibilities, and vulnerabilities. The process involves protecting rights equitably, safeguarding ethical elements, and promoting confidentiality throughout the decision-making process. The sixth step entails identifying alternative actions by listing options and weighing underlying pros and cons. Seventh, one needs to identify and assess the potential consequences of all decisions selected in the previous step. All possible outcomes should be equally acknowledged and evaluated to make an informed final decision. For instance, supporting Professor Purloin’s actions for his teacher-student relationship’s superiority would violate numerous ethical principles in research. The decision would have profound consequences for future students who would be skeptical about presenting term papers and other educational material. Finally, one can select a final decision from the collected data and chosen options, delivering a course of action and appropriate solutions for future ethical dilemmas. Assignment: A. Explain the influence of culture and social orientation on the development of your ethical strategy. You
might consider the following: What cultural implications did you feel you had to consider when
developing your strategy?
B. Explain the influence of diversity and equality on the development of your ethical strategy. You might
consider the following: What issues of diversity and equality were in the ethical scenario, and how were
they addressed? How did this influence your thought process and decisions while developing your
ethical strategy? C. Explain how controversial issues in ethics have shaped emerging ideas in ethics. Be sure to provide your
thoughts on this and how the development of your strategy was or was not influenced by controversial
issues. You might consider the following: Did you follow a strictly traditional model, or did you use a
more modern approach? How did this influence your thought process and decisions while developing
your ethical strategy?
D. Explain how your strategy could be changed to further address issues of multiple-role relationships and
justify your claims. In what ways does your strategy lack in its consideration of multiple-role
relationships? E. Explain how your strategy could be changed to further address issues of multicultural competence and
justify your claims. In what ways does your strategy lack in its consideration of multicultural
competence?
Requirements:   |   .doc file | APA | Case Study | 2 pages, Double spaced