HI5019 SIS Literature Review 文献综述 assignment 代写

HI5019 SIS Literature Review 文献综述 assignment 代写

HI5019 STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS T1 2017 HOLMES INSTITUTEFACULTY OFHIGHER EDUCATIONAssignment 1 (Literature Review)Individual AssignmentHI5019 STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS T1 2017WEEK 6 Friday 5 pmEach student will write a literature review of NOT more than 2000 words. The review shoulddemonstrate that the student has thoroughly researched their topic. Students should useexamples of business practice from the scholarly journals papers, conferences, books andprofessional magazines to support their argumentsThe literature review would be on an organisation (company) that is using accountingsoftware packages in Australia. The research would cover:PART 11. The current organizational structure2. What operational problems (e.g., inefficiency, errors) do you think the organisationcould experience because of this structure?3. What is the most likely system acquisition method— commercial software, customsoftware, or ERP?4. Describes and prepare a system flowchart of the sales procedures for the chosenorganisation (company)5. Identify any control problems in the system and what sorts of fraud are possible inthis system?PART 21. Development and adoption of the accounting software packages,2. The current market size,3. Identify the leaders in the market and what gives them the competitive advantage,4. Identify the current gaps or challenges encountered by users or customers ofaccounting software/packages and make relevant suggestions or recommendations.HI5019 STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS T1 2017 Submission Requirements:Research reports are to be presented in hard copy in size 12 Times New Roman or 10 CalibriFont and double spaced. The research should include a list of at least 5 references used inthe research report and a bibliography of the wider reading done to familiarize oneself withthe topic.Submission: Hard-copy to tutors/lecturers assignment box and a copy of the first page of thereport generated from SAFE ASSIGN attached to it. Soft copy to self-check and Final SubmissionYou are reminded to read the “Plagiarism” section of the course description. Your researchshould be a synthesis of ideas from a variety of sources expressed in your own words. Allreports must use the Harvard referencing style. Marking rubrics are attached.Assessment Criteria:Score  Very Good (15/15)  Good (11/15)  Satisfactory (9/15)  Unsatisfactory (5/15)Presentationand writing style/15 marks

HI5019 SIS Literature Review 文献综述 assignment 代写Information is well organized.Correct layout including timesnew roman, font size 12 orcalibri, font size10, doublespaced. About the rightlength.Very well written, excellentparaphrasing and propergrammar and punctuation areused throughout.Information isorganized, Correctlayout includingtimes new roman,font size 12 orcalibri, font size10,double spaced.About the rightlength.Well written, someparaphrasing andproper grammar andpunctuationInformation issomewhatorganized, Someelements of layoutor length incorrect.Proper grammarand punctuationmostly used, butoveruse of directquotes.Information is poorlyorganized, Someelements of layoutor length incorrect.Proper grammar andpunctuation notalways used.Excessive overuse ofdirect quotesScore  Very Good (15/15)  Good (11/15)  Satisfactory (9/15)  Unsatisfactory (5/15)Introduction/15 marksIntroduces the topic of theresearch report in anextremely engaging mannerwhich arouses the reader’sinterest.Gives a detailed generalbackground and indicates theoverall “plan”.Introduces the topicof the researchreport in anengaging mannerwhich arouses thereader’s interest.Gives some generalbackground andindicates the overall”plan” of the report.Satisfactorilyintroduces thetopic of theresearch report.Gives a generalbackground.Indicates theoverall “plan” ofthe report.Introduces the topicof the researchreport, but omits ageneral backgroundof the topic and/orthe overall “plan” ofthe report.Score  Very Good (20/20)  Good (15/20)  Satisfactory (10/20) Unsatisfactory (7/20)Evidence ofResearch/20 marksSubstantial range ofappropriate and current,supportive evidenceGood range ofappropriate andcurrent, supportiveevidence.Suitable range ofsupportiveevidence used. Notalways appropriateand/or current.Minimum cited.Insufficient range ornumber ofsupportive evidenceused.HI5019 STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS T1 2017 Score  Very Good (30/30)  Good (23/30)  Satisfactory (16/30) Unsatisfactory(10/30)Development ofDiscussion/30 marksLogical, insightful, originaldiscussion with well-connected paragraphs.Evidence of full engagementwith the literature found, withrelevant and detailed analysis.Detailed, originaldiscussion developslogically with someconnection betweenadjoiningparagraphs.Understanding ofreading shown.Some relevantanalysis.Adequatediscussion developslogically.Understanding ofreading shown.Few relevantanalysis.Inadequatediscussion of issuesand/or lacking inlogical flowLittle/nodemonstratedunderstanding ofreading.None/littlediscussion oranalysis.Score  Very Good (10/10)  Good (7/10)  Satisfactory (5/10)  Unsatisfactory (3/10)Conclusion/10 marksAn interesting, well writtensummary of the main points.An excellent final comment onthe subject, based on theinformation provided.A good summary ofthe main points.A good finalcomment on thesubject, based onthe informationprovided.Satisfactorysummary of themain points.A final comment onthe subject, butintroduced newmaterial.Poor/no summary ofthe main points.A poor finalcomment on thesubject and/or newmaterial introduced.Score  Very Good (10/10)  Good (7/10)  Satisfactory (5/10)  Unsatisfactory (3/10)Referencing/10 marksCorrect referencing (Harvard)All quoted material in quotesand acknowledged.All paraphrased materialacknowledged.Correctly set out reference listand bibliography included.Mostly correctreferencing(Harvard)All quoted materialin quotes andacknowledged. Allparaphrasedmaterialacknowledged.Mostly correctsetting out referencelist and bibliographyincluded.Mostly correctreferencing(Harvard) Someproblems withquoted materialand paraphrasedmaterialSome problemswith the referencelist or bibliography.Not all materialcorrectlyacknowledged.Some problems withthe reference list orbibliography.Total/100 marksFinal marks/20GeneralComments:HI5019 SIS Literature Review 文献综述 assignment 代写

The post HI5019 SIS Literature Review 文献综述 assignment 代写 appeared first on The Writer.